Can The War Be Justified History Essay

Can The War Be Justified History Essay The Cambodia-Vietnamese War was a series of conflicts involving various nations such as Cambodia, Vietnam, Hanoi, China and the United States of America. It was a conflict that flourished from border disputes between Cambodia and Vietnam. Minute aspects that contributed to this controversy stretched as far back as the 14th Century, when the Khmer Empire declined and when Khmers and Vietnamese dealt with an uneasy integration in an atmosphere of suppressed mistrust. The formlessness of the conflicts has made it difficult to identify the time frame unerringly but has been gauged that it occurred between 1975 and 1989. However, the war’s foremost conflict was the Cambodian Incursion by the Vietnamese in 1978. It is debatable to affirm if this controversy can be justified accordingly. By examining the manifold of causes and effects of the conflict with close study to the Just War Theory to substantiate my view, I will elaborate on why I think that a form of equilibrium has been e stablished of the war in terms of being unjust or otherwise. Vietnam possessed no precise or pertinent reason to invade Cambodia. Emory Swank, the U.S. Ambassador to Cambodia came to a conclusion that â€Å"The war is losing more and more of its point and has less and less meaning for any of the parties concerned.† (Schanberg and Pran 11). This is relative to the border disputes because of the U.S. involvement in providing military assistance for General Marshal Lon Nol, who overthrew Sihanouk in 1970, in Cambodia during the war. However, the Just War theory criteria, Jus ad bellum, states that a party must possess the right intention to go to war, and in turn will be granted the right to go to war (Just War Theory,  The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Cambodia and Vietnam’s feeble relationship fortified in 1965 when Prince Norodom Sihanouk of Cambodia, despite mistrusting the Vietnamese, allowed North Vietnamese Communists to â€Å"establish ‘sanctuarie s† inside the borders of Cambodia (Schanberg and Pran 11). After North and South Vietnam signed an agreement in Paris on January 27th 1973, Cambodian communists were left to stand alone. This being the basis of the international relationship provoked many controversies, but never provided Vietnam with a commensurable rationale to invade Cambodia. The invasion into Cambodia by the Vietnamese was a disproportionate response to the 2-year long border dispute between the two countries. According to Jus ad bellum, the â€Å"goal attained should be in proportion to the offence† (Just War Theory,  The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). However, over two million lives were at the expense of â€Å"settling disputes† between two countries. It is impossible for Vietnam’s eventual goal to measure up and find equilibrium with the execution of over two million inhabitants. The invasion failed to ameliorate, furthermore prevent more evil than it caused. According to statistics, a larger amount of people were directly affected by the invasion and massacre rather than the series of border conflicts. Thus, the invasion failed to prevent more human suffering than it caused. According to the theory, â€Å"the means used to fight must be in proportion to the wrong to be righted†. (Just War Theory,  The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) However, the lives of a massive number of people were at the expense of the Vietnamese invasion, therefore, with humanity at stake, the goal cannot be compared to the evil committed in this incursion.

How does belonging to an individualistic or collectivist culture Research Paper

How does belonging to an individualistic or collectivist culture influence your personality - Research Paper Example For instance, giving high self esteem, self respect, and opportunities to define and achieve personal goals. Keywords: individualistic, collectivist, emotional instability, personal goals, self esteem. Influence of individualistic society on personality â€Å"Because the self develops in accordance with cultural patterns, you would expect different forms of the self to develop in different societies.† (Millon & Grossman, 2004, p. 334) High motivation and dedication drive the ambitious persons in an individualistic society to achieve whatever they want in their personal and professional lives. Human personalities undergo gradual, yet massive changes while they live and adapt themselves to their respective surroundings. The cultural or societal influences are very strong and shape the way we behave, think, react, respond and handle our relationships and professions. Being a part of an individualistic society has exerted great influence on my personality. The basic ideologies of both societies are different; therefore, individuals living in either society behave differently and their basic approach to life, business and relationships are also entirely different. People in collectivist cultures, compared to people in individualist cultures, are likely to define themselves as aspects of groups, to give priority to in-group goals, to focus on context more than the content in making attributions and in communicating, to pay less attention to internal than to external processes as determinants of social behaviour, to define most relationships with in-group members as communal, to make more situational attributions, and tend to be self-effacing. (Triandis, 2001, pp. 907-924) The influence of an individualistic society is stronger if one is born and brought up in such society as compared to someone who is new to such culture. As individualism is reflected in almost all areas of individualistic societies, therefore it is impossible to adopt any other way of living. Thus, I have learnt to think about myself and my personal interests, dreams, ambitions, goals and fulfilment only. This is how I believe success can be achieved. In pursuit of my personal goals and dreams, I may be overriding others- but that is not important to me. Fulfilment of personal goals have become the sole object of my life- whether it is related to my personal happiness, professional or academic growth, or relationship with my family and friends. This is not to say that I have become selfish or eccentric- this is just to make sure that I don’t have to compromise, or suffer or sacrifice myself for the sake or benefit of others. Sometimes, things may go wrong, if one makes a wrong choice by being emotional. Being a part of an individualistic society, I have been trained to be rational, reasonable, calculative, mature, and think about the long term effects of any decision. Though I feel isolated and alienated at times by making such choices that are based solely on my personal interests, yet the modern technology and means of communication have made it easier for me to be a part of those social networks/ groups/ individuals that interest me. I am not bound to the people or their issues or problems of the physical society I live in- I am free to be part of the numerous individualistic

Income Taxes and Leases Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Income Taxes and Leases - Coursework Example According to Sachse (2006), all the timing differences cannot be reversed and that their tax effects cannot facilitate payment of deferred tax liability. For the advocates of the partial allocation of income tax, deferred tax liabilities would only be the portion of the comprehensive tax liability that was expected to result in the cash outflows (Sachse, 2006). Besides, this is not a conservative approach since the company management is given a leeway to choose the liabilities to recognize and those to avoid. Comprehensive allocation of income taxes This method requires that income tax expenses declared in the accounting period be affected by all transactions and be further included when calculating the pretax financial accounting revenue for that particular fiscal year. Both the GAAP and IFRS require the comprehensive allocation approach for the recognition of income taxes (Sachse, 2006). The matching argument is used in the justification of detailed allocation on grounds that the principle requires a full matching of revenue and expenses, hence the most conservative approach. Accounting for a capital-lease by the Lease The capital lease shall be recognized as an obligation, but valued as the initial lease-term’s minimum lease payment’s current value, but exclude executor expenses like maintenance, insurance and profit paid by the lessor. But in case the established amount exceeds the initial leased asset’s fair value, it may imply that obligation and asset value be considered as the fair value.